School referendum briefings

Shall the Adams-Friendship Area School District, Adams County, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $2,750,000 per year for four years, beginning with the 2027-2028 school year and ending with the 2030-2031 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of maintaining current 4K-5th grade and 6th-8th grade class sizes, existing career and technical education programming, co-curricular experiences, and operational costs associated with maintaining school buildings?

Source: newspaper legal notice

Shall the School District of Athens, Marathon and Taylor Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $600,000 per year for four years, beginning with the 2027-2028 school year and ending with the 2030-2031 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of operational and maintenance expenses?

Source: sample ballot

Shall the Barron Area School District, Barron and Dunn Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $1,500,000 per year for five years, beginning with the 2027-2028 school year and ending with the 2031-2032 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of operational and maintenance expenses?

Source: sample ballot

Shall the School District of Black River Falls, Jackson, Clark and Monroe Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $1,000,000 per year for four years, beginning with the 2026-2027 school year and ending with the 2029-2030 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of operational expenses, including to maintain class sizes and educational programs, transportation costs, and to address staff salaries and benefits?

Source: newspaper legal notice

Shall the School District of Bloomer, Chippewa and Dunn Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $77,000,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school building and facility improvement project consisting of: construction of a new high school with a community performing arts center; safety and security, capital maintenance and building infrastructure improvements at the Middle and Elementary Schools; and district-wide site improvements and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures and equipment?

Source: newspaper legal notice

Shall the Brillion Public School District, Calumet, Manitowoc and Brown Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $1,000,000 per year for five years, beginning with the 2026-2027 school year and ending with the 2030-2031 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of expenses to maintain educational programs and services, pay staff compensation, update technology, and building maintenance costs?

Source: newspaper legal notice

Question Number I

Shall the School District of Brown Deer, Milwaukee County, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $2,800,000 per year for five years, beginning with the 2026-2027 school year and ending with the 2030-2031 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of operational and maintenance expenses, including teacher and staff compensation?

Source: newspaper legal notice

Question Number II

Shall the School District of Brown Deer, Milwaukee County, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $35,000,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school facility improvement project consisting of: district-wide capital maintenance, building infrastructure, energy efficiency and accessibility improvements, including elevator replacement and playground renovations at the Elementary School; renovations at the Middle/High School, including to classrooms, the auditorium, pool and locker rooms; site improvements, including replacing the track and adding turf to the field at the Middle/High School; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures and equipment?

Source: newspaper legal notice

Be it resolved by the School Board of the School District of Cashton, Monroe, Vernon, and La Crosse Counties, Wisconsin that the revenues included in the School District budget be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.9 Wisconsin Statutes, by $450,000 per year for three years, beginning with the 2027-2028 school year and ending with the 2029-2030 school year, for non-recurring purposes of operational and maintenance expenses.

Text as filed with DPI (board resolution); the ballot wording had not been published as of October 6, 2026

Shall the De Soto Area School District, Vernon and Crawford Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $500,000 for the 2026-2027 school year, by $1,400,000 for the 2027-2028 school year and by $1,700,000 for the 2028-2029 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of maintaining facilities, instructional programs, student services and updating security and network technology systems?

Source: newspaper legal notice

Shall the School District of Delavan-Darien, Walworth and Rock Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $5,500,000 per year for four years, beginning with the 2027-2028 school year and ending with the 2030-2031 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of operational expenses, including student academic resources, co-curricular programming, employ School Resource Officers, and staff salaries and benefits?

Source: newspaper legal notice

Shall the Dodgeville School District, Iowa County, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $1,900,000 per year for three years, beginning with the 2026-2027 school year and ending with the 2028-2029 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of operational expenses, including educational programming?

Source: newspaper legal notice

Shall the School District of Edgar, Marathon County, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $1,400,000 per year for five years, beginning with the 2027-2028 school year and ending with the 2031-2032 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of facility maintenance and operational expenses?

Source: sample ballot

Shall the School District of Elmbrook, Waukesha County, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $100,000,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school facility improvement project at Pilgrim Park Middle School, Tonawanda Elementary School, Swanson Elementary School and Wisconsin Hills Middle School consisting of: renovations, accessibility updates, building infrastructure and site improvements; construction of additions at Pilgrim Park Middle School; construction of an addition at Tonawanda Elementary School; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures and equipment?

Source: district website

Shall the Evansville Community School District, Rock, Green and Dane Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $5,300,000 per year for four years, beginning with the 2027-2028 school year and ending with the 2030-2031 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of operational and maintenance expenses, including to provide student resources and educational programming and to address facility maintenance?

Source: sample ballot

Shall the School District of Fort Atkinson, located in Jefferson and Rock Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $7,100,000 beginning with the 2027-2028 school year, for recurring purposes consisting of operational and maintenance expenses?

Source: district website

Shall the Joint School District Number 2, Villages of Fox Point and Bayside, Milwaukee and Ozaukee Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $3,950,000 beginning with the 2027-2028 school year, for recurring purposes in order to maintain instructional programs, operations, and services?

Source: sample ballot

Shall the Geneva Jt. 4 School District, Town of Geneva and Town of Linn, Walworth County, be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91(2m), Wisconsin Statutes, by $750,000 in the 2027-2028 school year, by $1,000,000 in the 2028-2029 school year, by $1,250,000 in the 2029-2030 school year, and by $1,500,000 in the 2030-2031 school year for non-recurring purposes of paying the ongoing operational expenses of the school district?

Source: county clerk notice

Shall the Gillett School District, Oconto and Shawano Counties, Wisconsin, be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, of the Wisconsin Statutes, by $1,900,000 in each year for the 2026-2027, the 2027-2028, and the 2028-2029 school years, for non-recurring purposes, to sustain student educational programming, operations, and facilities maintenance?

Source: district website

Shall the School District of Glenwood City, St. Croix and Dunn Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $750,000 per year for four years, beginning with the 2026-2027 school year and ending with the 2029-2030 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of operational and maintenance expenses?

Source: newspaper legal notice

Shall the Granton Area School District, Clark County, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $400,000 per year for two years, beginning with the 2026-2027 school year and ending with the 2027-2028 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of operational and maintenance expenses?

Source: sample ballot

Shall the Green Bay Area Public School District, Brown County, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $29,000,000 for the 2027-2028 school year, by $36,000,000 for the 2028-2029 school year, by $44,000,000 for the 2029-2030 school year, and by $49,000,000 for the 2030-2031 school year, for non-recurring purposes including funding educational programs, staffing, and other operational expenses?

Source: county clerk notice

Question 1

Shall the School District of Greenfield, Milwaukee County, Wisconsin that the revenues included in the School District budget be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes by $5,000,000 beginning in the 2027-28 school year and every school year thereafter, through the 2030-31 school year, on a non-recurring basis for the purpose of operational expenditures related to sustaining class size, maintaining and supporting instructional programming, attracting and retaining high-quality staff, maintaining student mental health supports, staying current with educational technology, maintaining student transportation services, and other educational expenditures?

Source: county clerk notice

Question 2

Shall the foregoing resolution of the Board of Education of the School District of Greenfield be approved: BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Education of the School District of Greenfield, Milwaukee County, Wisconsin shall be issued pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statues, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $35,000,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of school facility improvement projects consisting of capital maintenance and improvement, safety, security, and other site improvements at schools of the School District; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures, and equipment?

Source: county clerk notice

Shall the School District of Hillsboro, Vernon, Richland, Monroe, Juneau and Sauk Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $1,100,000 per year for four years, beginning with the 2027-2028 school year and ending with the 2030-2031 school year, for non-recurring purposes to maintain District facilities and current programs?

Source: sample ballot

Shall the School District of Iola-Scandinavia, Waupaca and Portage Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $1,200,000 for the 2026-2027 school year, and by $1,500,000 per year for three years, beginning with the 2027-2028 school year and ending with the 2029-2030 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of sustaining educational programming, student opportunities and operations?

Source: sample ballot

Shall the School District of Janesville, Rock County, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $18,500,000 for the 2027-2028 school year, by $22,500,000 for the 2028-2029 school year, by $26,500,000 for the 2029-2030 school year, and by $30,500,000 for the 2030-2031 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of paying the costs of maintaining District class size, student program options and services?

Source: district website

Shall the School District of Ladysmith, Rusk County, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $950,000 per year for five years, beginning with the 2027-2028 school year and ending with the 2031-2032 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of maintaining current educational programs, student services, and general maintenance?

Source: newspaper legal notice

Question: Shall the Lake Mills Area School District, Jefferson County, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $2,900,000 per year for four years, beginning with the 2026-2027 school year and ending with the 2029-2030 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of operational expenses, including educational programming, staff salaries and benefits, technology, maintenance, and transportation expenses?

Source: district website

Question Number I

Shall the Little Chute Area School District, Outagamie County, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $400,000 per year for five years, beginning with the 2027-2028 school year and ending with the 2031-2032 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of operational expenses for technology hardware, software, and infrastructure?

Source: newspaper legal notice

Question Number II

Shall the Little Chute Area School District, Outagamie County, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $1,950,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school facility improvement project consisting of: district building infrastructure and capital maintenance improvements, including roof repairs and replacement at all school buildings, asbestos abatement and related renovations at the High School, and air conditioning replacement at the Elementary School; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures and equipment?

Source: newspaper legal notice

Question 1

Shall the School District of Lodi, Columbia and Dane Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $5,980,000 per year for five years, beginning with the 2027-2028 school year and ending with the 2031-2032 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of operational expenses for instructional and educational programming, technology updates and staff compensation?

Source: county clerk notice

Question 2

Shall the School District of Lodi, Columbia and Dane Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $13,200,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school facility improvement project consisting of: renovations at the High School, including to the career and technical educational spaces, indoor pool, and athletic and pool locker rooms; construction of athletic practice fields, a varsity baseball field and corresponding site improvements at the Primary School; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures and equipment?

Source: county clerk notice

Shall the Luxemburg-Casco School District, Kewaunee and Brown Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $1,800,000 per year for three years, beginning with the 2027-2028 school year and ending with the 2029-2030 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of operational expenses including teacher and staff compensation and benefits and maintaining reading, math, and college and technical career programming.

Source: district website

Shall the Marinette School District, Marinette County, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $68,000,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school facility improvement project at the Middle and High Schools consisting of: construction of additions and renovations at the Middle School, including for career and technical education, art, music, special education and commons spaces; renovations at the High School, including to career and technical education, music, science spaces and locker rooms; building infrastructure, systems, safety, security, accessibility and site improvements; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures and equipment?

Source: newspaper legal notice

Shall the Markesan District Schools be authorized to exceed state revenue limits on a non-recurring basis by $700,000.00 in each of four (4) consecutive years for the 2026-27, 2027-28, 2028-29, and 2029-30 school years to maintain School District programs and operations?

Source: district website

Shall the School District of Mayville, Dodge County, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $950,000 per year for seven years, beginning with the 2027-2028 school year and ending with the 2033-2034 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of operational and maintenance expenses, including to maintain district facilities, for school safety and security, student transportation, and educational programming?

Source: district website

Shall the Middleton-Cross Plains Area School District, Dane County, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $24,900,000 for the 2027-2028 school year, by $27,900,000 for the 2028-2029 school year, by $31,100,000 for the 2029-2030 school year and by $34,600,000 for the 2030-2031 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of expenses related to ongoing educational and extracurricular programming, and compensation, and other operational expenses?

Source: district website

Question 1

Question: Shall the Joint School District Number 1, Towns of Minocqua, Hazelhurst and Lake Tomahawk, Oneida County, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $3,500,000 beginning with the 2027-2028 school year, for recurring purposes consisting of operational expenses, maintenance expenses, and debt service for capital improvements?

Source: sample ballot

Shall the Montello School District, Marquette and Green Lake Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $2,000,000 in each year for the 2026-2027 school year, the 2027-2028 school year, the 2028-2029 school year and the 2029-2030 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of operational and maintenance expenses, including for educational programming, facility maintenance and employee compensation and benefits?

Source: county clerk notice

Shall the Oconomowoc Area School District, Waukesha, Jefferson and Dodge Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $3,000,000 for the 2027-2028 school year; by an additional $2,000,000 (for a total of $5,000,000) for the 2028-2029 school year; by an additional $2,000,000 (for a total of $7,000,000) for the 2029-2030 school year; by an additional $2,500,000 (for a total of $9,500,000) for the 2030-2031 school year; and by an additional $2,700,000 for the 2031-2032 school year (for a total of $12,200,000 and to remain at that amount thereafter), for recurring purposes consisting of operational and maintenance expenses?

Source: sample ballot

Shall the Oconto Unified School District, Oconto County, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $900,000 per year for five years, beginning with the 2027-2028 school year and ending with the 2031-2032 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of District operation and maintenance costs?

Source: newspaper legal notice

Shall the Palmyra-Eagle Area School District, located in Waukesha, Jefferson and Walworth Counties, Wisconsin, be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $797,000 per year for four years, beginning with the 2027-2028 school year and ending with the 2030-2031 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of operational expenses, including but not limited to maintaining programs and staffing?

Source: newspaper legal notice

Shall the Pardeeville Area School District, Columbia and Marquette Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $13,100,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school facility improvement project consisting of: construction of an addition and renovations at the Middle/High School, including for classrooms and instructional space, restrooms, a cafeteria and a safe and secure entrance; demolition of the Balliet building; renovations at the High School, including to restrooms and for expansion of the existing kitchen/cafeteria; district-wide capital improvement projects identified in the district's capital improvement plan; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures and equipment?

Source: county clerk notice

Question Number I

Shall the School District of Princeton, Green Lake and Marquette Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $575,000 for the 2027-2028 school year and by $1,200,000 per year for three years, beginning with the 2028-2029 school year and ending with the 2030-2031 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of costs associated with educational programming and staffing, ongoing maintenance and operations?

Source: newspaper legal notice

Question Number II

Shall the School District of Princeton, Green Lake and Marquette Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $14,000,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school facility improvement project consisting of: district-wide safety and security improvements, including construction of secure entrances, building systems, infrastructure and capital maintenance improvements; renovations to instructional spaces; site and track improvements; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures and equipment?

Source: newspaper legal notice

Shall the Pulaski Community School District, Brown, Oconto, Shawano and Outagamie Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $59,800,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school facility improvement project consisting of: construction of an addition and renovations at Lannoye Elementary School, including for classrooms, special education, and support spaces; renovations at Pulaski Community Middle School in Career and Technology Education (CTE), including Technology and Engineering Education, Agriscience, Family and Consumer Science, and Business and Information Technology classroom spaces, and conversion of the existing pool to a multi-purpose activity facility; construction of additions and renovations at Pulaski High School, including for a community swimming pool facility, a fitness/weight center, wrestling space, additions and renovations to Career and Technology Education (CTE) classroom spaces in select program areas, renovations to classrooms and labs, and construction of tennis courts and parking lot expansion; district-wide capital maintenance, building systems and site improvements; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures and equipment?

Source: county clerk notice

Shall the School District of Reedsburg, Sauk and Juneau Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $83,000,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school building project consisting of: construction of a new middle school on district-owned land, site improvements, and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures and equipment?

Source: newspaper legal notice

Shall the Ripon Area School District, Fond du Lac, Winnebago and Green Lake Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $500,000 for the 2027-2028 school year and by $1,350,000 per year for the 2028-2029 school year through the 2032-2033 school year, on a non-recurring basis, for the purpose of maintaining current educational programming, academic resources, and district operations?

Source: newspaper legal notice

Shall the Seneca Area School District, located in Crawford County, Wisconsin, be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $500,000 for recurring purposes starting with the 2027-2028 school year and by an additional $470,000 for recurring purposes starting with the 2028-2029 school year, for a total recurring amount of $970,000 for purposes consisting of operational costs to maintain instructional programs, staffing, technology, transportation, and facilities management?

Source: newspaper legal notice

Shall the Seymour Community School District, Outagamie and Shawano Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $5,000,000 per year for three years, beginning with the 2027-2028 school year and ending with the 2029-2030 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of operational and maintenance expenses, including expenses related to staffing and to maintain programs and services?

Question as filed with DPI; not yet confirmed against a published notice

Shall the School District of Sheboygan Falls, Sheboygan County, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $65,700,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school facility improvement project consisting of: renovations and updates at the Elementary School, including to special education and classroom spaces, the media center and cafeteria/kitchen; construction of additions and renovations at the High School for science classrooms and labs, career and technical education, a science, technology, engineering and math lab, the media center and weight room/fitness area; renovations and updates at the High School, including to special education and classroom spaces, the locker rooms, existing gymnasium and auditorium; district-wide accessibility, safety, security and site improvements; other capital projects identified in the District's capital improvement plan; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures and equipment?

Source: news

Shall the School District of Siren, Burnett County, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $750,000.00 per year for four years beginning with the 2027-2028 school year and ending with the 2030-2031 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of operational expense, including to maintain educational and elective programming at Siren Schools?

Source: district website

Shall the School District of Somerset, located in St. Croix County, Wisconsin, be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $1,400,000 per year for five years, beginning with the 2027-2028 school year and ending with the 2031-2032 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of operational expenses, including but not limited to staffing, facility maintenance, and maintaining programs and services?

Source: newspaper legal notice

Shall the Southern Door County School District, Door County, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $2,055,000 per year for 3 years, beginning with the 2026-2027 school year and ending with the 2028-2029 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of operational expenses for teacher and staff compensation, restoring select teaching positions, and maintaining school facilities?

Source: newspaper legal notice

Shall The School District of Sturgeon Bay, Door County, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $3,750,000 per year for five years, beginning with the 2027-2028 school year and ending with the 2031-2032 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of operational expenses, including funding educational programming for students and teacher and staff compensation?

Source: newspaper legal notice

Shall the annual budget of the Swallow School District, Waukesha County, Wisconsin, be authorized to exceed the statutory revenue limit by $500,000 per year beginning with the 2026-2027 school year and ending with the 2030-2031 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of funding operational expenses and current educational programs?

Source: district website

Shall the School District of Thorp, Clark and Taylor Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $8,500,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school facility improvement project consisting of: district-wide capital maintenance and building infrastructure improvements, including plumbing, electrical, HVAC, roof, asphalt and fire safety repairs and replacements; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures and equipment?

Source: county clerk notice

Shall the School District of the Tomorrow River, Portage County, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $1,100,000 per year for three years, beginning with the 2027-2028 school year and ending with the 2029-2030 school year, for non-recurring purposes?

Source: sample ballot

Shall the Trevor-Wilmot Consolidated School District, Kenosha County, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $1,900,000 per year for four years, beginning with the 2027-2028 school year and ending with the 2030-2031 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of expenses related to maintaining educational programming, safety and facilities?

Source: newspaper legal notice

Shall the School District Number 4, Village of Twin Lakes, Kenosha County, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $800,000 per year for four years, beginning with the 2026-2027 school year and ending with the 2029-2030 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of operational and maintenance expenses?

Source: newspaper legal notice

Question Number I

Shall the Unity School District, Polk County, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $32,000,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school facility improvement project at the district campus consisting of: construction of an addition and renovations at the High School, including for career and technical education and automotive space, and cafeteria and food service updates; safety, traffic flow, parking and site improvements; district-wide capital maintenance and building infrastructure improvements, including roof replacement; athletic facility and accessibility improvements, and reconstruction of baseball, football and softball fields, the tennis courts and track; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures and equipment?

Source: sample ballot

Question Number II

Shall the Unity School District, Polk County, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $600,000 beginning with the 2026-2027 school year, for recurring purposes consisting of operational and maintenance expenses?

Source: sample ballot

Shall the Viroqua Area School District, Vernon and Crawford Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $1,800,000 per year for four years, beginning with the 2027-2028 school year and ending with the 2030-2031 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of operation and maintenance expenses of the District?

Source: newspaper legal notice

Shall the School District of Washburn, Bayfield County, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $900,000 for the 2026-2027 school year, by $1,100,000 for the 2027-2028 school year, by $1,300,000 for the 2028-2029 school year, and by $1,500,000 for the 2029-2030 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of operational and maintenance expenses?

Source: newspaper legal notice

Question 1

Shall the Waunakee Community School District, Dane County, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $4,200,000 for the 2027-2028 school year; by an additional $2,100,000 for the 2028-2029 school year; by an additional $2,100,000 for the 2029-2030 school year; and by an additional $2,100,000 for the 2030-2031 school year (for a total of $10,500,000 and to remain at that amount thereafter), for recurring purposes consisting of ongoing operational expenses and employee compensation expenses?

Source: sample ballot

Question 2

Shall the Waunakee Community School District, Dane County, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $97,500,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school facility improvement project consisting of: removal of an older portion of the High School and construction of additions and renovations at the High School; renovations at the old middle school (known as the High School South Campus); outdoor athletic field renovations and improvements at the High School Campus; district-wide renovations, capital maintenance and site improvements; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures and equipment?

Source: sample ballot

Shall the School District of Wausaukee be authorized to exceed state revenue limits on a non-recurring basis by $800,000.00 in the 2026-2027 school year, $1,000,000.00 in the 2027-2028 school year, $1,200,000.00 in the 2028-2029 school year, and $1,400,000.00 in the 2029-2030 school year, and $1,600,000.00 in the 2030-2031 school year, for nonrecurring purposes, with such revenues used to maintain and enhance the District’s educational programming and for operational and maintenance expenses?

Source: newspaper legal notice

Shall the School District of West De Pere, Brown and Outagamie Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $4,900,000 per year for five years, beginning with the 2027-2028 school year and ending with the 2031-2032 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of operational and maintenance expenses?

Source: county clerk notice

Shall the Westby Area School District, Vernon, La Crosse and Monroe Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $1,600,000 for the 2027-2028 school year, by $1,700,000 for the 2028-2029 school year, and by $1,800,000 for the 2029-2030 school year, for non-recurring purposes to sustain educational programs and to operate the District?

Source: county clerk notice

Shall the School District of Westfield, Marquette, Waushara and Adams Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $1,400,000 per year for five years, beginning with the 2026-2027 school year and ending with the 2030-2031 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of operational expenses related to transportation, staffing, academic programming, curriculum updates, and career/trade pathways?

Source: district website

Shall the School District of Weyauwega-Fremont, Waupaca, Winnebago and Waushara Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $8,450,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school facility improvement project consisting of: safety, security, building infrastructure and site improvements at Fremont Elementary School, Weyauwega Elementary School and Weyauwega Middle School; construction of a secure entrance at Weyauwega Elementary School; district-wide capital maintenance; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures and equipment?

Source: newspaper legal notice

Shall the School District of Whitefish Bay, Milwaukee County, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $90,000,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school building and facility improvement project consisting of: construction of additions, renovations, partial removal of the existing building and site improvements at the Middle School on its current site; building infrastructure and capital maintenance improvements at the High School; fire protection and alarm system updates and replacement at the High School, Cumberland and Richards Elementary Schools; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures and equipment?

Source: district website

Shall the Whitehall School District, Trempealeau and Jackson Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $1,250,000 per year for two years, beginning with the 2027-2028 school year and ending with the 2028-2029 school year, to continue the approval for non-recurring purposes consisting of operational and maintenance expenses?

Source: district website

Shall the Whitewater Unified School District, Walworth, Jefferson and Rock Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $5,500,000 per year for four years, beginning with the 2027-2028 school year and ending with the 2030-2031 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of the following: maintaining student support and mental health services, maintaining comprehensive instructional and co-curricular programs, and maintaining technology, safety, and facilities infrastructure?

Source: newspaper legal notice

Shall the School District of Williams Bay, Walworth County, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $2,000,000 for the 2027-2028 school year, by $2,250,000 for the 2028-2029 school year, by $2,500,000 for the 2029-2030 school year, and by $2,750,000 for the 2030-2031 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of ongoing operational expenses?

Source: newspaper legal notice

Shall the School District of Winter, located in Sawyer County and Rusk County, Wisconsin, be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $1,500,000 per year for four years, beginning with the 2027-2028 school year and ending with the 2030-2031 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of operational expenses, including but not limited to school safety, staffing, and facility maintenance?

Source: newspaper legal notice

Shall the School District of Wisconsin Dells, Sauk, Adams, Columbia, Juneau and Marquette Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $1,800,000 beginning with the 2026-2027 school year, for recurring purposes consisting of maintaining current elementary, middle and high school class sizes, technology equipment, existing career and technical education programming, along with operational costs associated with all school buildings?

Source: newspaper legal notice

To exceed the revenue limit by $500,000 per year for four years for non-recurring purposes

Text as filed with DPI (board resolution); the ballot wording had not been published as of October 6, 2026

Shall Anderson Community School Corporation continue to increase property taxes paid to the school corporation for no more than eight (8) years for the purpose of funding daily operational needs and academic and support programs by imposing a property tax rate that does not exceed $0.1077 and results in a maximum annual amount that does not exceed $2,903,078. If this operating referendum public question is NOT approved by the voters, for a median residence of $100,000, the property's annual tax bill would decrease by $54.00 per year. If this operating referendum public question is approved by the voters, it would be a renewal of the most recent operating referendum public question passed in 2018 with a property tax rate of $0.1077.

Source: Indiana DLGF final determination 26-005-REF

Shall Barr-Reeve Community Schools, Inc. increase property taxes paid to the school corporation for no more than eight (8) years for the purpose of funding and maintaining small class sizes, athletics and extra-curricular programs, elementary music and physical education programs and school safety and mental health resources in response to decreases in property tax revenue by imposing a property tax rate that does not exceed $0.40 and results in a maximum annual amount that does not exceed $2,200,000? If this operating referendum public question is approved by the voters, for a median residence of $250,000, the property's annual property tax bill would increase by $454 per year.

Source: Indiana DLGF final determination 26-016-REF

Shall Bartholomew Consolidated School Corporation continue to increase property taxes paid to the school corporation for no more than eight (8) years for the purpose of funding and maintaining competitive compensation for teachers and staff and maintaining student safety by imposing a property tax rate that does not exceed $0.156 and results in a maximum annual amount that does not exceed $10,100,000. If this operating referendum public question is NOT approved by the voters, for a median residence of $250,000, the property’s annual tax bill would decrease by $190 per year. If this operating referendum public question is approved by the voters, it would be a renewal of the most recent operating referendum public question passed in 2020 with a property tax rate of $0.156.

Source: Indiana DLGF final determination 26-013-REF

Shall Carmel Clay Schools increase property taxes paid to the School Corporation for no more than eight (8) years for the purpose of funding and sustaining educational and operational stability in response to reductions in property tax revenue by repealing and replacing its existing referendums, including supporting student safety, health, and well-being, including the employment and retention of school resource officers; supporting and retaining teachers and staff; and funding academic and support programs to meet the educational needs of all students, by imposing a property tax rate that does not exceed $0.4274 and results in a maximum annual amount that does not exceed $61,981,519? If this operating referendum public question is approved by the voters, for a median residence of $500,000, the property's annual property tax bill would increase by $1,062 per year. The most recent operating referendum public question proposed by the school corporation was held in 2023 and passed.

Source: Indiana DLGF final determination 26-030-REF

Shall Clark-Pleasant Community School Corporation continue to increase property taxes paid to the school corporation for no more than eight (8) years for the purpose of funding and maintaining school safety initiatives, including the Clark-Pleasant police department, student support services and programming in response to reductions in property tax revenue by imposing a property tax rate that does not exceed $0.09 and results in a maximum annual amount that does not exceed $4,400,000. If this operating referendum public question is NOT approved by the voters, for a median residence of $300,000, the property's annual property tax bill would decrease by $127 per year. If this operating referendum public question is approved by the voters, it would be a renewal of the most recent operating referendum public question passed in 2018 with a property tax rate of $0.10.

Source: Indiana DLGF final determination 26-010-REF

Shall Crown Point Community Schools increase property taxes paid to the School Corporation for no more than eight (8) years for the purpose of funding and sustaining educational and operational funding stability in response to reductions in property tax revenue, supporting essential health and safety initiatives, supporting and retaining teachers and staff, maintaining class sizes, student transportation, and funding academic and support programs to meet the educational needs of all students, by imposing a property tax rate that does not exceed $0.3870 and results in a maximum annual amount that does not exceed $19,750,000? If this operating referendum public question is approved by the voters, for a median residence of $350,000 the property's annual property tax bill would increase by $648 per year. The most recent operating referendum public question proposed by the school corporation was held in 2025 and passed.

Source: Indiana DLGF final determination 26-034-REF

Shall Culver Community Schools Corporation increase property taxes paid to the school corporation for no more than eight (8) years for the purpose of funding and sustaining educational and operational funding stability in response to reductions in property tax revenue, including maintaining student safety, health, and well-being initiatives; attracting, retaining, and supporting teachers and staff; maintaining class sizes; and funding academic and support programs to meet the educational needs of all students, by imposing a property tax rate that does not exceed $0.24 and results in a maximum annual amount that does not exceed $2,899,000? If this operating referendum public question is approved by the voters, for a median residence of $200,000, the property’s annual property tax bill would increase by $208 per year. The most recent operating referendum public question proposed by the school corporation was held in November 2018 and passed.

Source: Indiana DLGF final determination 26-041-REF

Shall the Elwood Community School Corporation, Madison County, Indiana, increase property taxes paid to the school corporation for no more than eight (8) years immediately following the holding of the referendum for the purpose of funding teacher and staff retention and recruitment efforts to maintain current class sizes, student transportation, student and staff technology programs, and school safety and security programs and projects by imposing a property tax rate that does not exceed $0.4900 per $100 of net assessed value and results in a maximum annual amount that does not exceed $2,500,000. If this operating referendum public question is approved by the voters, for a median residence of $100,000, the property’s annual property tax bill would increase by $245 per year.

Source: Indiana DLGF final determination 26-033-REF

Shall Franklin Community Schools increase property taxes paid to the School Corporation for no more than eight (8) years for the purpose of funding and sustaining educational and operational funding stability in response to reductions in property tax revenue, including supporting and retaining teachers and staff, essential student health and safety initiatives, managing class sizes, academic programs, and opportunities to meet the learning needs of all students, by imposing a property tax rate that does not exceed $0.2900 and results in a maximum annual amount that does not exceed $9,000,000? If this operating referendum public question is approved by the voters, for a median residence of $250,000, the property’s annual property tax bill would increase by $329 per year. The most recent operating referendum public question proposed by the school corporation was held in May 2019 and passed.

Source: Indiana DLGF final determination 26-037-REF

Shall Frontier School Corporation increase property taxes paid to the School Corporation for no more than eight (8) years for the purpose of funding and sustaining educational and operational stability in response to reductions in property tax revenue, supporting essential health and safety initiatives, attracting and retaining teachers and staff, managing class sizes, and funding academic and support programs to meet the educational needs of all students, by imposing a property tax rate that does not exceed $0.25 and results in a maximum annual amount that does not exceed $1,750,000? If this operating referendum public question is approved by the voters, for a median residence of $250,000, the property's annual property tax bill would increase by $284 per year.

Source: Indiana DLGF final determination 26-017-REF

Shall the Hamilton Southeastern Schools increase property taxes paid to the school corporation for no more than eight (8) years for the purpose of funding the HSE Referendum Program by (1) repealing the existing referendum fund tax levy extended in 2023, and (2) replacing the existing referendum fund tax levy with a new referendum fund tax levy which will provide funding for (a) the salary and benefits of approximately 275 staff members, (b) the behavioral health contract that supports therapists in our school buildings with essential mental health support during the school day, (c) the shared salaries and benefits of school resource officers, (d) the salary and benefits of the Director of School Safety, (e) the salaries and benefits of traffic control and after school event security, and (f) the purchase of safety and security supplies and equipment by imposing a property tax rate that does not exceed $0.3600 and results in a maximum annual amount that does not exceed $47,500,000. If this operating referendum public question is approved by the voters, for a median residence of $400,000, the property's annual property tax bill would increase by $700 per year. The most recent operating referendum public question proposed by the school corporation was held in 2023 and passed.

Source: Indiana DLGF final determination 26-032-REF

Shall the Indianapolis Public Education Corporation increase property taxes paid to the Indianapolis Public Schools (“IPS”) and participating charter schools for no more than four (4) years for the purpose of funding teacher and staff retention, professional development, and advancing academic programs and opportunities by imposing a property tax rate that does not exceed $0.372 per $100 of assessed value and results in a maximum annual amount that does not exceed $95,000,000? If this operating referendum public question is approved by the voters, for a median residence of $150,000, the property's annual property tax bill would increase by $221 per year.

Source: Indiana DLGF final determination 26-029-REF

Shall the Metropolitan School District of Decatur Township increase property taxes paid to the school corporation for no more than eight (8) years for the purpose of funding the #Decatur Community and School Improvement Program by (1) repealing the existing referendum fund tax levy approved by the voters in 2019, and (2) replacing the existing referendum fund tax levy with a new referendum fund tax levy which will provide funding for student transportation, utility expenses, school safety and security programs, building maintenance and support services by imposing a property tax rate that does not exceed $0.2690 and results in a maximum annual amount that does not exceed $9,000,000. If this operating referendum public question is approved by the voters, for a median residence of $250,000, the property’s annual property tax bill would increase by $306 per year. The most recent operating referendum public question proposed by the school corporation was held in 2019 and passed.

Source: Indiana DLGF final determination 26-039-REF

Shall the Metropolitan School District of Shakamak increase property taxes paid to the school corporation for no more than eight (8) years for the purpose of funding and maintaining daily educational operations, including recruiting and retaining teachers and staff, supporting essential safety initiatives, maintaining class sizes, and funding academic programs and opportunities to meet the learning needs of all students, in response to reductions in property tax revenue, by imposing a property tax rate that does not exceed $0.25 and results in a maximum annual amount that does not exceed $499,000. If this operating referendum public question is approved by the voters, for a median residence of $100,000, the property's annual property tax bill would increase by $81 per year.

Source: Indiana DLGF final determination 26-024-REF

Shall M.S.D. of Washington Township continue to increase property taxes paid to the school corporation for no more than eight (8) years for the purpose of repealing the existing referendum fund tax rate and replacing the existing referendum fund tax rate with a new rate that will provide funding for retaining teachers and staffing for improved student safety, increased student support services, as well as expanded academic programming in alignment with the new diploma requirements by imposing a property tax rate that does not exceed $0.25 and results in a maximum annual amount that does not exceed $24,000,000? If this operating referendum public question is NOT approved by the voters, for a median residence of $300,000, the property's annual property tax bill would decrease by $351 per year. If this operating referendum public question is approved by the voters, it would be a renewal of the most recent operating referendum public question passed in 2020 with a property tax rate of $0.25.

Source: Indiana DLGF final determination 26-031-REF

Shall the Metropolitan School District of Wayne Township increase property taxes paid to the school district for no more than eight (8) years for the purpose of funding the Wayne Forward Initiative to sustain educational and operational stability in response to reductions in property tax revenue, including recruiting and retaining classroom teachers, funding student safety and school security, and maintaining daily educational operations by imposing a property tax rate that does not exceed $0.70 and results in a maximum annual amount that does not exceed $41,019,552. If this operating referendum public question is approved by the voters, for a median residence of $200,000, the property's annual property tax bill would increase by $605 per year. The most recent operating referendum public question proposed by the school district was held in 2019 and passed.

Source: Indiana DLGF final determination 26-025-REF

Shall the Michigan City Area Schools increase property taxes paid to the School Corporation for no more than eight (8) years for the purpose of funding the Maximize Community and Students (MCAS) initiative which will sustain educational and operational funding stability in response to reductions in property tax revenue by recruiting and retaining educators and staff, supporting essential student health and safety initiatives, and maintaining class sizes, academic programs, and opportunities to meet educational needs by imposing a property tax rate that does not exceed $0.2998 and results in a maximum annual amount that does not exceed $10,000,000. If this operating referendum public question is approved by the voters, for a median residence of $200,000, the property's annual property tax bill would increase by $260 per year.

Source: Indiana DLGF final determination 26-035-REF

Shall the Mississinewa Community School Corporation increase property taxes paid to the school corporation for no more than eight (8) years for the purpose of funding the Putting Our Kids First Initiative, funding investments in student transportation, school security upgrades, and the competitive compensation needed to recruit and retain teachers and staff, by imposing a property tax rate that does not exceed $0.4950 per $100 of assessed value and results in a maximum annual amount that does not exceed $2,000,000? If this operating referendum public question is approved by the voters, for a median residence of $150,000, the property’s annual property tax bill would increase by $294 per year.

Source: Indiana DLGF final determination 26-022-REF

Shall Noblesville Schools increase property taxes paid to the school corporation for no more than eight (8) years for the purpose of funding safety and security measures in all buildings and maintaining and enhancing academic and educationally-related programs in response to reductions in property tax revenue by imposing a property tax rate that does not exceed $0.57 and results in a maximum annual amount that does not exceed $43,842,578. If this operating referendum public question is approved by the voters, for a median residence of $350,000, the property's annual property tax bill would increase by $955 per year.

Source: Indiana DLGF final determination 26-015-REF

Shall Oak Hill United School Corporation increase property taxes paid to the School Corporation for no more than eight (8) years for the purpose of funding and sustaining educational and operational stability in response to reductions in property tax revenue, including maintaining essential health and safety initiatives including the employment and retention of school resource officers and nurses, supporting, attracting and retaining teachers and staff, maintaining class sizes and student transportation, and funding academic and support programs to meet the educational needs of all students, by imposing a property tax rate that does not exceed $0.3332 and results in a maximum annual amount that does not exceed $1,627,112? If this operating referendum public question is approved by the voters, for a median residence of $150,000, the property's annual property tax bill would increase by $198 per year.

Source: Indiana DLGF final determination 26-009-REF

Shall the Oregon-Davis School Corporation continue to increase property taxes paid to the school corporation for no more than eight (8) years for the purpose of funding current educational and operational expenses by imposing a property tax rate that does not exceed nineteen cents ($0.19) and results in a maximum annual amount that does not exceed $800,000? If this operating referendum is NOT approved by the voters, for a median residence of $150,000, the property's annual tax bill would decrease by $173 per year. If this operating referendum public question is approved by the voters, it would be renewal of the most recent operating referendum public question passed in 2018 with a property tax rate of twenty-nine cents ($0.29).

Source: Indiana DLGF final determination 26-027-REF

Shall Pike County School Corporation increase property taxes paid to the school corporation for no more than eight (8) years for the purpose of funding and maintaining daily educational operations, including maintaining operations at existing school buildings, retaining teachers and staff, supporting essential safety initiatives, and providing academic and CTE programs and opportunities to meet the learning needs of all students in response to reductions in property tax revenue, by imposing a property tax rate that does not exceed $0.25 and results in a maximum annual amount that does not exceed $2,200,000? If this operating referendum public question is approved by the voters, for a median residence of $150,000, the property's annual property tax bill would increase by $149 per year.

Source: Indiana DLGF final determination 26-004-REF

Shall Porter Township School Corporation increase property taxes paid to the school corporation for no more than eight (8) years for the purpose of funding and sustaining educational and operational funding stability in response to reductions in property tax revenue, including maintaining essential health and safety initiatives, including the employment and retention of school resource officers, supporting and retaining teachers and staff, managing class sizes, maintaining essential student transportation and funding academic and support programs to meet the educational needs of all students, by imposing a property tax rate that does not exceed $0.3576 and results in a maximum annual amount that does not exceed $3,500,000. If this operating referendum public question is approved by the voters, for a median residence of $350,000, the property’s annual property tax bill would increase by $599 per year

Source: Indiana DLGF final determination 26-023-REF

Shall the River Forest Community School Corporation continue to increase property taxes paid to the School Corporation for no more than eight (8) years for the purpose of sustaining educational and operational funding stability in response to reductions in property tax revenue, maintaining student transportation, supporting and retaining teachers and staff, and supporting essential health and safety initiatives, including the retention of school resource officers by imposing a property tax rate that does not exceed $0.9912 and results in a maximum annual amount that does not exceed $3,000,000. If this operating referendum public question is NOT approved by the voters, for a median residence of $150,000, the property's annual tax bill would decrease by $589 per year. If this operating referendum public question is approved by the voters, it would be a renewal of the most recent operating referendum public question passed in 2019 with a property tax rate of $1.19.

Source: Indiana DLGF final determination 26-038-REF

Shall the School City of Beech Grove increase property taxes paid to the school corporation for no more than eight (8) years for the purpose of funding the Beech Grove City Schools: Believe in our Future initiative, by continuing existing essential student services, including school bus transportation, school facilities maintenance, and student safety and security services, including School Resource Officers, by imposing a property tax rate that does not exceed fifty-seven cents ($0.57) and results in a maximum annual amount that does not exceed $4,400,000? If this operating referendum public question is approved by the voters, for a median residence of $200,000, the property's annual property tax bill would increase by $493 per year.

Source: Indiana DLGF final determination 26-002-REF

Question 1

Shall School City of Whiting increase property taxes paid to the School Corporation for no more than eight (8) years for the purpose of funding and sustaining educational and operational stability in response to reductions in property tax revenue, supporting essential health and safety services, including retaining and employing school resource officers, attracting and retaining teachers and staff, maintaining class sizes, and funding academic and student support programs to meet the educational needs of all students, by imposing a property tax rate that does not exceed $0.3372 and results in a maximum annual amount that does not exceed $2,500,000? If this operating referendum public question is approved by the voters, for a median residence of $250,000 the property's annual property tax bill would increase by $383 per year. The most recent operating referendum public question proposed by the school corporation was held in 2023 and failed.

Source: Indiana DLGF final determination 26-012-REF

Question 2

Shall School City of Whiting increase property taxes paid to the School Corporation for no more than twenty-three years for the purpose of funding the School City of Whiting 2026 Student Facilities, Safety, and Transportation Improvement Project which includes health, safety, and security upgrades to all school facilities; renovation and improvements and the potential construction of additions to student learning environments at all school buildings; upgrades to school buildings to support technology-ready classrooms; and construction of and improvements to athletic and support facilities and performing arts and music facilities, including a band room, together with the purchase of equipment, technology and buses, and student safety improvements for which the principal debt amount for the project will cost no more than $39,305,000 and the financing cost including interest and fees will cost no more than an additional $28,810,000 and is estimated to increase the property taxes paid to the School Corporation by imposing a property tax rate that results in a maximum annual amount that does not exceed $3,500,000. If this capital referendum public question is approved by the voters, for a median residence of $250,000, the property's annual property tax bill would increase by $530 per year.

Source: Indiana DLGF final determination 26-014-REF

Shall Shelbyville Central Schools increase property taxes paid to the school corporation for no more than 8 years for the purpose of funding and maintaining current educational and operational programs in response to reductions in property tax revenue, including student transportation, maintaining class sizes, school safety, and recruiting and retaining staff, by imposing a property tax rate that does not exceed $0.22 and results in a maximum annual amount that does not exceed $3,606,064. If this operating referendum public question is approved by the voters, for a median residence of $200,000, this property's annual property tax bill would increase by $191 per year.

Source: Indiana DLGF final determination 26-019-REF

Shall Sheridan Community School Corporation increase property taxes paid to the school corporation for no more than eight (8) years for the purpose of funding and sustaining educational and operational stability in response to reductions in property tax revenue, including the retention and attraction of teachers and staff, academic related programs and operational expenses by imposing a property tax rate that does not exceed $0.40 and results in a maximum annual amount that does not exceed $2,900,000. If this operating referendum public question is approved by the voters, for a median residence of $250,000, the property's annual property tax bill would increase by $454 per year. The most recent operating referendum public question proposed by the school corporation was held in 2023 and passed.

Source: Indiana DLGF final determination 26-003-REF

Shall Smith-Green Community Schools continue to increase property taxes paid to the School Corporation for no more than eight (8) years for the purpose of funding and sustaining educational and operational funding stability in response to reductions in property tax revenue, maintaining health and safety initiatives, supporting and retaining teachers and staff, maintaining class sizes and transportation services, and funding academic and support programs to meet the educational needs of all students, while changing the current maximum operating referendum tax rate of $0.6280, by imposing a property tax rate that does not exceed $0.4988 and results in a maximum annual amount that does not exceed $2,176,300? If this operating referendum public question is NOT approved by the voters, for a median residence of $200,000, the property’s annual property tax bill would decrease by $431 per year. If this operating referendum public question is approved by the voters, it would be a renewal of the most recent operating referendum public question passed in 2018 with a property tax rate of $0.6280.

Source: Indiana DLGF final determination 26-042-REF

Shall Southeast Dubois County School Corporation continue to increase property taxes paid to the school corporation for no more than eight (8) years for the purpose of funding and maintaining academic and educationally-related programs and opportunities to meet the learning needs of all students, student health and safety initiatives, maintaining class sizes and recruiting and retaining teachers and staff in response to reductions in property tax revenue by imposing a property tax rate that does not exceed $0.19 and results in a maximum annual amount that does not exceed $1,242,788. If this operating referendum public question is NOT approved by the voters, for a median residence of $200,000, the property's annual tax bill would decrease by $164 per year. If this operating referendum public question is approved by the voters, it would be a renewal of the most recent operating referendum public question passed in 2020 with a property tax rate of $0.19.

Source: Indiana DLGF final determination 26-008-REF

Shall the Tipton Community School Corporation increase property taxes paid to the school corporation for no more than eight (8) years for the purpose of providing funding to maintain academic programs, class sizes, and student support, health, and safety services, attract and retain teachers and support staff, maintain student transportation services, and sustain educational and operational funding stability by imposing a property tax rate that does not exceed $0.25 and results in a maximum annual amount that does not exceed $2,000,000. If this operating referendum public question is approved by the voters, for a median residence of $200,000, the property's annual property tax bill would increase by $216 per year.

Source: Indiana DLGF final determination 26-036-REF

Shall Tri-Central Community Schools increase property taxes paid to the school corporation for no more than eight (8) years for the purpose of funding and maintaining daily educational operations, including recruiting and retaining teachers and staff, supporting essential safety initiatives, and maintaining class sizes, academic programs and opportunities to meet the learning needs of all students in response to reductions in property tax revenue by imposing a property tax rate that does not exceed $0.24 and results in a maximum annual amount that does not exceed $1,100,000. If this operating referendum public question is approved by the voters, for a median residence of $150,000, the property's annual property tax bill would increase by $143 per year.

Source: Indiana DLGF final determination 26-011-REF

Shall Tri-Creek School Corporation increase property taxes paid to the school corporation for no more than eight (8) years for the purpose of replacing lost property tax revenue, funding bus transportation, student programs, and school safety by imposing a property tax rate that does not exceed seventeen and thirty-eight hundredths cents ($0.1738) and results in a maximum annual amount that does not exceed three million dollars ($3,000,000)? If this operating referendum public question is approved by the voters, for a median residence of $300,000, the property’s annual property tax bill would increase by $245 per year. The most recent operating referendum public question proposed by the school corporation was held in 2023 and failed.

Source: Indiana DLGF final determination 26-028-REF

Shall Union Township School Corporation increase property taxes paid to the school corporation for no more than eight (8) years for the purpose of funding and continuing educational and operational stability in response to reductions in property tax revenue, including attracting and retaining teachers and staff, maintaining class sizes, maintaining academic and educationally related programs, and maintaining essential safety and security standards for the children of Union Township by imposing a property tax rate that does not exceed $0.35 and results in a maximum annual amount that does not exceed $3,374,291. If this operating referendum public question is approved by the voters, for a median residence of $400,000, the property's annual property tax bill would increase by $681 per year.

Source: Indiana DLGF final determination 26-020-REF

Shall the Wa-Nee Community School Corporation increase property taxes paid to the school corporation for no more than eight (8) years for the purpose of funding improvements for the safety, security, and well-being of Wa-Nee students by imposing a property tax rate that does not exceed $0.10 and results in a maximum annual amount that does not exceed $1,750,000. If this school safety referendum public question is approved by the voters, for a median residence of $250,000, the property’s annual property tax bill would increase by $114 per year.

Source: Indiana DLGF final determination 26-026-REF

Shall West Lafayette Community School Corporation increase property taxes paid to the school corporation for no more than eight (8) years for the purpose of funding academic programming and operating expenditures and sustaining educational and operational stability in response to reductions in property tax revenue by imposing a property tax rate that does not exceed $0.5706 and results in a maximum annual amount that does not exceed $16,100,000? If this operating referendum public question is approved by the voters, for a median residence of $350,000, the property's annual property tax bill would increase by $956 per year. The most recent operating referendum public question proposed by the school corporation was held in 2023 and passed.

Source: Indiana DLGF final determination 26-006-REF

Shall Westfield Washington Schools increase property taxes paid to the school corporation for no more than eight (8) years for the purpose of funding educational and operational expenses due to reductions in property tax revenue through the Excellent Schools → Excellent Community initiative including student safety by the addition of School Resource Officers in each school; maintaining small class sizes; advancing student health and well-being by adding school counselors, social workers, and mental health supports; advancing academic and essential programs to meet the educational needs of all students; and supporting and retaining teachers and staff by imposing a property tax rate that does not exceed $0.3941 and results in a maximum annual amount that does not exceed $38,000,000? If this operating referendum public question is approved by the voters, for a median residence of $450,000 the property's annual property tax bill would increase by $873 per year. The most recent operating referendum public question proposed by the school corporation was held in 2022 and passed.

Source: Indiana DLGF final determination 26-007-REF

Shall Zionsville Community Schools increase property taxes paid to the school corporation for no more than eight (8) years for the purpose of funding and sustaining academic and educationally related programs and managing class sizes which reflect community standards by imposing a property tax rate that does not exceed 0.4128 and results in a maximum annual amount that does not exceed $21,463,325. If this operating referendum public question is approved by the voters, for a median residence of $600,000.00, the property's annual property tax bill would increase by $1,368.00 per year. The most recent property tax referendum proposed by the school corporation was held in 2019 and passed.

Source: Indiana DLGF final determination 26-001-REF

Summary: Income tax — 0.75% income tax, 5 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Issue 8

A renewal of a tax for the benefit of the Alliance City School District for the purpose of constructing, adding to, renovating, remodeling, rehabilitating, improving, furnishing and equipping buildings for school purposes and acquiring, improving, and equipping school sites, that the county auditor estimates will collect $317,547 annually, at a rate not exceeding 2 mills for each $1 of taxable value, which amounts to $17 for each $100,000 of the county auditor’s market value, for 5 years, commencing in 2027, first due in calendar year 2028.

Source: Stark County BOE legal notice of election (Published in The Alliance Review on October 14 and 21, 2026)

Issue 1

Summary: New operating levy — 5.97 mills, continuing, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from Lorain County BOE issues list; official wording to follow.

Summary: Renewal levy — 9.9 mills, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Income tax — 1% income tax, continuing, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Issue 4

Summary: Bond issue — $96.2M in bonds, 37 years, for bonds: replace craddock elementary with a grades 1-3 school, replace the bus garage, repairs. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from WKYC list - Northeast Ohio school levies, bond issues on the Nov. 3 election ballot (updated 2026-09-29); official wording to follow.

Summary: Renewal levy — 1.3 mills, 5 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Income tax — 1% income tax, 5 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from WKYC list - Northeast Ohio school levies, bond issues on the Nov. 3 election ballot (updated 2026-09-29); official wording to follow.

Summary: Income tax — 1% income tax, continuing, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Income tax — 0.5% income tax, continuing, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from WKYC list - Northeast Ohio school levies, bond issues on the Nov. 3 election ballot (updated 2026-09-29); official wording to follow.

Summary: Renewal levy — 5.48 mills, 5 years, for current operating expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Issue 5

Shall the Bexley City School District be authorized to do both of the following: 1. Impose an annual income tax of 0.5 per cent on the school district income of individuals, for a continuing period of time, beginning January 1, 2027 for the purpose of current expenses? 2. Issue bonds for the purpose of constructing school facilities; renovating, repairing, expanding, improving, and constructing additions to school facilities; furnishing and equipping the same in the principal amount of $29,250,000, to be repaid annually over a maximum period of 30 years, and levy a property tax outside the ten-mill limitation estimated by the county auditor to average over the bond repayment period 2.05 mills for each $1 of taxable value, which amounts to $72 for each $100,000 of the county auditor's market value, to pay the annual debt charges on the bonds, and to pay debt charges on any notes issued in anticipation of those bonds?

Source: Franklin County BOE notice of election (Form 126/122, dated 08/17/2026)

Summary: Renewal levy — 3.72 mills, 5 years, for current operating expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Renewal levy — 3.8 mills, 5 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: New operating levy — 5.9 mills, 5 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Renewal levy — 9.7 mills, 5 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Renewal levy — 2.57 mills, 5 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Income tax — 0.75% income tax, 5 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Income tax — 1% income tax, 5 years, for current operating expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from WKYC list - Northeast Ohio school levies, bond issues on the Nov. 3 election ballot (updated 2026-09-29); official wording to follow.

Issue 4

An additional tax for the benefit of the Cincinnati City School District for the purpose of current expenses that the county auditor estimates will collect $66,336,723 annually, at a rate not exceeding 7 mills for each $1 of taxable value, which amounts to $245 for each $100,000 of the county auditor's market value, for 5 years, commencing in 2026, first due in calendar year 2027. The county auditor has certified that the amount by which the carry-over balance in the district's general operating budget from the preceding fiscal year exceeds the district's general fund expenditures made in the preceding fiscal year is $37,352,861, which is 6% of those expenditures.

Source: Hamilton County BOE certified November 2026 Ballot Issues (ballot language)

Summary: Income tax — 0.5% income tax, 5 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Renewal levy — 2 mills, continuing, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Issue 2

Summary: Renewal levy — 3.91 mills, 5 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from Lorain County BOE issues list; official wording to follow.

Issue 4

An additional tax for the benefit of the Cleveland Heights – University Heights City School District for the purpose of current expenses that the County Fiscal Officer estimates will collect $11,100,193 annually, at a rate not exceeding 6.5 mills for each $1 of taxable value, which amounts to $228 for each $100,000 of the County Fiscal Officer’s market value, for a continuing period of time, commencing in 2026, first due in calendar year 2027. The County Fiscal Officer has certified that the amount by which the carry-over balance in the district’s general operating budget from the preceding fiscal year exceeds the district’s general fund expenditures made in the preceding fiscal year is $0, which is 0% of those expenditures.

Source: Cuyahoga County BOE issues list (ballot language)

Summary: Income tax — 0.75% income tax, continuing, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Permanent improvement — 2 mills, 5 years, for permanent improvements. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Permanent improvement — 3.5 mills, 5 years, for general permanent improvements. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Issue 6

Summary: New operating levy — 5.5 mills, 5 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from WKYC list - Northeast Ohio school levies, bond issues on the Nov. 3 election ballot (updated 2026-09-29); official wording to follow.

Summary: Permanent improvement — 2 mills, 5 years, for permanent improvements. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: New operating levy — 7 mills, continuing, for current operating expenses (5 mills) and general permanent improvements (2 mills). Official wording not yet published.

Terms from Dayton Daily News reporting; official wording to follow.

Summary: Permanent improvement — 0.75 mills, 10 years, for school maintenance and current expenses (franklin boe); improving, renovating, remodeling, enlarging, furnishing and equipping school buildings (osba). Official wording not yet published.

Terms from Franklin County BOE certified questions and issues; official wording to follow.

Summary: Renewal levy — 5.5 mills, 5 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Income tax — 1.25% income tax, 5 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Income tax — 1% income tax, continuing, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Combined levy — 6.49 mills, for 0.5% income tax + bonds for constructing school facilities. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from Wood County BOE certified questions and issues list; official wording to follow.

Summary: Renewal levy — 1.85 mills, 5 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Renewal levy — 2.88 mills, 5 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Issue 4

Summary: New operating levy — 8.9 mills, continuing, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from Lorain County BOE issues list; official wording to follow.

Issue 5

An additional tax for the benefit of the Euclid City School District for the purpose of current expenses that the County Fiscal Officer estimates will collect $6,867,483 annually, at a rate not exceeding 6.75 mills for each $1 of taxable value, which amounts to $236 for each $100,000 of the County Fiscal Officer’s market value, for a continuing period of time, commencing in 2026, first due in calendar year 2027. The County Fiscal Officer has certified that the amount by which the carry-over balance in the district’s general operating budget from the preceding fiscal year exceeds the district’s general fund expenditures made in the preceding fiscal year is $0, which is 0% of those expenditures.

Source: Cuyahoga County BOE issues list (ballot language)

Summary: Income tax — 0.25% income tax, 5 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Issue 1

Summary: Income tax — 1.25% income tax, 5 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from Butler County BOE issue list + WVXU reporting; official wording to follow.

Issue 4

Shall an annual income tax of 1.25 per cent on the earned income of individuals residing in the school district be imposed by Franklin City School District, for 5 years, beginning January 1, 2027, for the purpose of current expenses?

Source: Warren County BOE upcoming-issues ballot language

Summary: Income tax — 1.25% income tax, 5 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Issue 6

Shall a fixed-sum levy renewing an existing levy be imposed by the Garfield Heights City School District for the purpose of paying the current operating expenses of the district in the sum of $4,100,000 and a levy of taxes to be made outside of the ten-mill limitation estimated by the County Fiscal Officer to average 7.74 mills for each $1 of taxable value, which amounts to $271 for each $100,000 of the County Fiscal Officer’s market value, for a period of five years, commencing in 2027, first due in calendar year 2028?

Source: Cuyahoga County BOE issues list (ballot language)

Summary: Renewal levy — 4.75 mills, 5 years, for current operating expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Renewal levy — 0.5 mills, 5 years, for educational technology. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Issue 7

A renewal of a tax for the benefit of Independence Local School District for the purpose of general permanent improvements that the County Fiscal Officer estimates will collect $587,996 annually, at a rate not exceeding 1.25 mills for each $1 of taxable value, which amounts to $26 for each $100,000 of the County Fiscal Officer’s market value, for five years, commencing in 2027, first due in calendar year 2028.

Source: Cuyahoga County BOE issues list (ballot language)

Summary: Renewal levy — 1 mills, 10 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Permanent improvement — 2.55 mills, 5 years, for permanent improvements. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Issue 4

4.36 Mills Renewal Levy - paying the current operating expenses of the district in the sum of $2,278,636 - amounting to $134 for each $100,000 of the county auditor's market value - 5 years - commencing in 2027, first due in 2028.

Terms from Lake County BOE certified questions and issues (summary, updated 8/14/2026); official wording to follow.

Summary: Income tax — 1% income tax, continuing, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from Wood County BOE certified questions and issues list; official wording to follow.

Summary: Permanent improvement — 1 mills, 5 years, for general permanent improvements. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Issue 2

Summary: Bond issue — $223.48M in bonds, 37 years, for bonds for phase one of the master facilities plan (grades 6-12 buildings); ofcc adds $77m to a $300m phase. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from Butler BOE issue list + district news release + WYSU; official wording to follow.

Summary: Permanent improvement — 0.5 mills, 5 years, for permanent improvements. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Issue 5

Shall an annual income tax of 1 per cent on the earned income of individuals residing in the school district be imposed by Lebanon City School District, for 10 years, beginning January 1, 2027, for the purpose of current expenses?

Source: Warren County BOE upcoming-issues ballot language

Summary: Income tax — 0.75% income tax, 10 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Renewal levy — 4.8 mills, 5 years, for current operating expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Renewal levy — 2.3 mills, 5 years, for current operating expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Renewal levy — 5.99 mills, 5 years, for acquire, construct, enlarge, renovate, finance general permanent improvements; current operating expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Combined levy — 2.85 mills, for bonds to renovate existing buildings (bond 2.85 mills) + 0.25% income tax. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from WKYC list - Northeast Ohio school levies, bond issues on the Nov. 3 election ballot (updated 2026-09-29); official wording to follow.

Summary: Permanent improvement — 4 mills, 5 years, for general permanent improvements. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Renewal levy — 14.4 mills, 5 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Bond issue — $11M in bonds, 20 years, for bonds: natatorium and fitness/multipurpose center, furnishing, equipping, site improvements. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from WKYC list - Northeast Ohio school levies, bond issues on the Nov. 3 election ballot (updated 2026-09-29); official wording to follow.

Summary: Income tax — 0.75% income tax, 5 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Issue 7

Shall a fixed-sum levy renewing an existing levy be imposed by the Massillon City School District for the purpose of paying the current operating expenses of the district in the sum of $3,430,178 and a levy of taxes to be made outside of the ten-mill limitation estimated by the county auditor to average 4.9 mills for each $1 of taxable value, which amounts to $172 for each $100,000 of the county auditor’s market value, for a period of 5 years, commencing in 2027, first due in calendar year 2028? The county auditor has certified that the amount by which the carry-over balance in the district’s general operating budget from the preceding fiscal year exceeds the district’s general fund expenditures made in the preceding fiscal year is $0, which is 0% of those expenditures.

Source: Stark County BOE legal notice of election (Published in The Independent on October 14 and 21, 2026)

Summary: Renewal levy — 2.95 mills, 5 years, for current operating expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Income tax — 1.25% income tax, continuing, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Combined levy — 6.99 mills, for 0.25% income tax + bonds for a new k-12 building and improvements. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from Wood County BOE certified questions and issues list; official wording to follow.

Issue 5

3.5 Mills Additional Levy - current expenses - collecting $9,613,354 annually - amounting to $123 for each $100,000 of the county auditor's market value - 5 years - commencing in 2026, first due in 2027.

Terms from Lake County BOE certified questions and issues (summary, updated 8/14/2026); official wording to follow.

Summary: Renewal levy — 2.2 mills, 5 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Income tax — 0.5% income tax, continuing, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Shall an annual income tax of one percent (1.00%) on the earned income of individuals residing in the school district be imposed by Mount Vernon City School District, for 30 years, beginning January 1, 2027, for the purpose of current expenses?

Source: Public notice of the ballot question, Mount Vernon News (2026-09-26)

Summary: Income tax — 1% income tax, 5 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from Wood County BOE certified questions and issues list; official wording to follow.

Summary: Income tax — 1% income tax, continuing, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Issue 5

Shall an annual income tax of 1.25 percent on the earned income of individuals residing in the school district be imposed by the North College Hill City School District, for 5 years, beginning January 1, 2027, for the purpose of current expenses?

Source: Hamilton County BOE certified November 2026 Ballot Issues (ballot language)

Summary: Renewal levy — 9.9 mills, 10 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Permanent improvement — 2.2 mills, continuing, for general permanent improvements. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Issue 6

Shall an annual income tax of 1.5 percent on the earned income of individuals residing in the school district be imposed by the Northwest Local School District, for a continuing period of time, beginning January 1, 2027, for the purpose of current expenses?

Source: Hamilton County BOE certified November 2026 Ballot Issues (ballot language)

Summary: Renewal levy — 4.32 mills, 5 years, for current operating expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Permanent improvement — 1 mills, 5 years, for permanent improvements. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Renewal levy — 1.8 mills, 5 years, for current operating expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Income tax — 0.75% income tax, continuing, for current operating expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from WKYC list - Northeast Ohio school levies, bond issues on the Nov. 3 election ballot (updated 2026-09-29); official wording to follow.

Summary: Permanent improvement — 1.8 mills, continuing, for general permanent improvements. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Issue 8

Summary: Income tax — 0.75% income tax, 5 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from Lorain County BOE issues list; official wording to follow.

Issue 9

Summary: Renewal levy — 1.3 mills, 5 years, for educational technology. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from Lorain County BOE issues list; official wording to follow.

Summary: Renewal levy — 6.3 mills, 5 years, for operating expenses & general permanent improvements. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Issue 8

An additional tax for the benefit of the Orange City School District for the purpose of current expenses that the County Fiscal Officer estimates will collect $7,755,983 annually, at a rate not exceeding 5 mills for each $1 of taxable value, which amounts to $175 for each $100,000 of the County Fiscal Officer’s market value, for a continuing period of time, commencing in 2026, first due in calendar year 2027. The County Fiscal Officer has certified that the amount by which the carry-over balance in the district’s general operating budget from the preceding fiscal year exceeds the district’s general fund expenditures made in the preceding fiscal year is $0, which is 0% of those expenditures.

Source: Cuyahoga County BOE issues list (ballot language)

Summary: Income tax — 1% income tax, 5 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from WKYC list - Northeast Ohio school levies, bond issues on the Nov. 3 election ballot (updated 2026-09-29); official wording to follow.

Issue 6

Shall an annual income tax of 1.25 per cent on the earned income of individuals residing in the school district be imposed by Painesville City Local School District, for a continuing period of time, beginning January 1, 2027, for the purpose of current expenses?

Terms from Lake County BOE certified questions and issues (updated 8/14/2026); official wording to follow.

Summary: Permanent improvement — 2.5 mills, 5 years, for general permanent improvements. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Income tax — 0.75% income tax, 5 years, for permanent improvements. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Renewal levy — 4.9 mills, 5 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Permanent improvement — 2.5 mills, 5 years, for general permanent improvements. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Income tax — 0.75% income tax, 10 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from Franklin County BOE certified questions and issues; official wording to follow.

Issue 5

Shall bonds be issued by the Plain Local School District for the purpose of constructing, furnishing, equipping, renovating, rehabilitating, remodeling, adding to and otherwise improving School District buildings and facilities, acquiring, clearing, equipping and otherwise improving sites therefor, and demolishing existing buildings and facilities in the principal amount of $116,800,000, to be repaid annually over a maximum period of 37 years, and an annual levy of property taxes be made outside the ten-mill limitation, estimated by the county auditor to average over the repayment period of the bond issue 3.5 mills for each $1 of taxable value, which amounts to $123 for each $100,000 of the county auditor’s market value, commencing in 2026, first due in calendar year 2027, to pay the annual debt charges on the bonds, and to pay debt charges on any notes issued in anticipation of those bonds?

Source: Stark County BOE legal notice of election (Published in The Repository on October 14 and 21, 2026)

Summary: Renewal levy — 3.57 mills, 5 years, for current operating expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Permanent improvement — 1 mills, 5 years, for permanent improvements. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Permanent improvement — 2.9 mills, continuing, for general permanent improvements. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Renewal levy — 2.44 mills, 5 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Issue 7

Shall an annual income tax of 1 per cent on the earned income of individuals residing in the school district be imposed by Riverside Local School District, for a continuing period of time, beginning January 1, 2027, for the purpose of current expenses and permanent improvements?

Terms from Lake County BOE certified questions and issues (updated 8/14/2026); official wording to follow.

Summary: New operating levy — 4.9 mills, continuing, for current operating expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from WKYC list - Northeast Ohio school levies, bond issues on the Nov. 3 election ballot (updated 2026-09-29); official wording to follow.

Issue 6

Shall a fixed-sum levy renewing an existing levy be imposed by the Sandy Valley Local School District for the purpose of paying the current operating expenses of the district in the sum of $750,000 and a levy of taxes to be made outside of the ten-mill limitation estimated by the county auditor to average 2.3 mills for each $1 of taxable value, which amounts to $81 for each $100,000 of the county auditor’s market value, for a period of 5 years, commencing in 2027, first due in calendar year 2028? The county auditor has certified that the amount by which the carry-over balance in the district’s general operating budget from the preceding fiscal year exceeds the district’s general fund expenditures made in the preceding fiscal year is $0, which is 0% of those expenditures.

Source: Stark County BOE legal notice of election (Published in The Repository on October 14 and 21, 2026)

Summary: Permanent improvement — 1 mills, 5 years, for general permanent improvements. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Issue 6

The question of issuing bonds in the principal amount of two hundred twenty million dollars ($220,000,000) for the purpose of constructing, furnishing, and equipping a new Westland High School and new Grove City High School, with related site improvements; constructing school facilities and renovating, repairing, expanding, and improving existing school facilities; furnishing and equipping the same; and improving the sites thereof. The maximum number of years over which the principal of the bonds may be paid is 38 years. The estimated additional average annual property tax levy amounts to $79 for each $100,000 of the county auditor's market value, which is 2.26 mills for each one dollar in excess of the tax limitation as estimated and certified by the county auditor. The first calendar year in which the tax is expected to be due is 2027.

Source: Franklin County BOE notice of election on issue of bonds (Form 122, dated 08/17/2026)

Summary: Income tax — 0.5% income tax, 5 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Bond issue — $80.71M in bonds, 35 years, for construct, renovate, repair, expand, improve school facilities. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from News report of the Licking BOE preliminary issue list; official wording to follow.

Summary: Income tax — 2% income tax, continuing, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from News report of the Licking BOE preliminary issue list; official wording to follow.

Issue 7

Shall an annual income tax of 0.25 percent on the earned income of individuals residing in the school district be imposed by the Southwest Local School District, for a continuing period of time, beginning January 1, 2027, for the purpose of current expenses?

Source: Hamilton County BOE certified November 2026 Ballot Issues (ballot language)

Summary: Income tax — 1% income tax, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Income tax — 0.5% income tax, 5 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Renewal levy — 3.17 mills, 5 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Renewal levy — 5.1 mills, 5 years, for current expenses & general permanent improvements. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Issue 9

An additional tax for the benefit of the Strongsville City School District for the purpose of current expenses that the County Fiscal Officer estimates will collect $15,427,256 annually, at a rate not exceeding 6.7 mills for each $1 of taxable value, which amounts to $235 for each $100,000 of the County Fiscal Officer’s market value, for five years, commencing in 2026, first due in calendar year 2027. The County Fiscal Officer has certified that the amount by which the carry-over balance in the district’s general operating budget from the preceding fiscal year exceeds the district’s general fund expenditures made in the preceding fiscal year is $0, which is 0% of those expenditures.

Source: Cuyahoga County BOE issues list (ballot language)

Issue 8

An additional tax for the benefit of the Sycamore Community City School District for the purpose of current expenses and permanent improvements that the county auditor estimates will collect $17,993,971 annually, at a rate not exceeding 6.95 mills for each $1 of taxable value, which amounts to $243 for each $100,000 of the county auditor's market value, for a continuing period of time, commencing in 2026, first due in calendar year 2027. The county auditor has certified that the amount by which the carry-over balance in the district's general operating budget from the preceding fiscal year exceeds the district's general fund expenditures made in the preceding fiscal year is $30,498,210, which is 28% of those expenditures.

Source: Hamilton County BOE certified November 2026 Ballot Issues (ballot language)

Summary: Combined levy — 3.2 mills, for 1% earned income tax paired with a 1.7-mill reduction in an existing property tax levy (renewal of part). Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA list + 13abc reporting; official wording to follow.

Summary: Income tax — 1% income tax, continuing, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from WKYC list - Northeast Ohio school levies, bond issues on the Nov. 3 election ballot (updated 2026-09-29); official wording to follow.

Summary: Renewal levy — 1.31 mills, 5 years, for current operating expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Issue 9

Proposed Tax Levy (Additional) Toledo City School District. An additional tax for the benefit of Toledo City School District for the purpose of current expenses that the county auditor estimates will collect $22,817,500 annually, at a rate not exceeding 6.9 mills for each $1 of taxable value, which amounts to $242 for each $100,000 of the county auditor's market value, for 5 years, commencing in 2026, first due in calendar year 2027. The county auditor has certified that the amount by which the carry-over balance in the district's general operating budget from the preceding fiscal year exceeds the district's general fund expenditures made in the preceding fiscal year is $0, which is 0% of those expenditures.

Source: Lucas County BOE sample ballot (precinct Toledo 9F)

Summary: Income tax — 0.75% income tax, 3 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from WKYC list - Northeast Ohio school levies, bond issues on the Nov. 3 election ballot (updated 2026-09-29); official wording to follow.

Summary: Renewal levy — 5.8 mills, 5 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Combined levy — 1.99 mills, for bonds (1.15 mills, 37 years) to renovate and add to the bethel campus + 0.84-mill continuing permanent improvement levy to maintain it. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from Clermont Sun reporting + OSBA list; official wording to follow.

Issue 7

Shall the Upper Arlington City School District be authorized to do the following: 1. Issue bonds for the purpose of constructing, furnishing, and equipping Burbank Early Childhood School and Hastings Middle School, with related site improvements; constructing, renovating, furnishing, and equipping Jones Middle School, with related site improvements; and constructing, furnishing and equipping an addition to the high school, with related and additional site improvements in the principal amount of $273,500,000, to be repaid annually over a maximum period of 38 years, and levy a property tax outside the ten-mill limitation, estimated by the county auditor to average over the bond repayment period 4.84 mills for each $1 of taxable value, which amounts to $169 for each $100,000 of the county auditor's market value, to pay the annual debt charges on the bonds, and to pay debt charges on any notes issued in anticipation of those bonds? 2. Levy an additional property tax to pay current operating expenses, that the county auditor estimates will collect $14,396,791 annually, at a rate not exceeding 4.9 mills for each $1 of taxable value, which amounts to $172 for each $100,000 of the county auditor's market value, for a continuing period of time?

Source: Franklin County BOE notice of election (Form 126/122, dated 08/17/2026)

Summary: Renewal levy — 6.03 mills, 5 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Income tax — 1% income tax, 5 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from WKYC list - Northeast Ohio school levies, bond issues on the Nov. 3 election ballot (updated 2026-09-29); official wording to follow.

Summary: Renewal levy — 4.65 mills, 5 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Income tax — 1% income tax, 7 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Income tax — 1.75% income tax, continuing, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Income tax — 0.5% income tax, 5 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Summary: Permanent improvement — 0.5 mills, 5 years, for general permanent improvements. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from Stark County BOE questions and issues list; official wording to follow.

Summary: Permanent improvement — 1 mills, 5 years, for general permanent improvements. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.

Issue 8

Shall an annual income tax of 0.75 per cent on the earned income of individuals residing in the school district be imposed by Willoughby-Eastlake City School District, for a continuing period of time, beginning January 1, 2027, for the purpose of current expenses?

Terms from Lake County BOE certified questions and issues (updated 8/14/2026); official wording to follow.

Issue 9

An additional tax for the benefit of Winton Woods City School District for the purpose of current expenses that the county auditor estimates will collect $5,346,642 annually, at a rate not exceeding 6.95 mills for each $1 of taxable value, which amounts to $243 for each $100,000 of the county auditor's market value, for a continuing period of time, commencing in 2026, first due in calendar year 2027. The county auditor has certified that the amount by which the carry-over balance in the district's general operating budget from the preceding fiscal year exceeds the district's general fund expenditures made in the preceding fiscal year is $16,517,941, which is 26% of those expenditures.

Source: Hamilton County BOE certified November 2026 Ballot Issues (ballot language)

Summary: Income tax — 1.75% income tax, 10 years, for current expenses. Official wording not yet published.

Terms from OSBA levy database (pre-election list); official wording to follow.